Left Area of Banner Top of Banner
Bottom of Banner
Home Button Products Button Concepts Button Services Button Clients Button Login Button About Us Button
Concepts Section
Framework

Learning Objects

Strategies

Templates

White Papers

 
Back to Top

White Papers Page

Learning Object Design

In this section, we will address the following topics:
Training Materials for the Information Age
Introduction
Learning Object Design
Content Management
Information Retrieval
The impact of objects on instructional design

The use of an object-oriented approach to content amplifies some of the familiar problems associated with the design of instructional materials. It also presents some new ones. Consider this checklist of instructional design requirements in light of a new, granular approach to content:
  • Achieve consistency in scope, form and quality across objects and authors
  • Objects need to be self-contained and instructionally effective
  • Not illogical when mixed in different sequences with other objects
  • Appealing, interactive and sensitive to different learning styles
  • Design standard is realistic for authors to achieve with speed and efficiency
  • Design can be employed by available instructors, developers and SMEs
  • Results are adaptable to rapid change and easy to update
There is no magic bullet to address of all of these, and other, considerations. Indeed, some apply today among developers of any form of course materials. But when we consider the challenges of shifting to a whole new approach to content design, we would appreciate something that addresses a number of the issues in one swipe.

General guideline for packaging content as learning objects
When it comes to the design of an object of content, consider the following general guidelines:
  1. Orient the object around an instructional objective.
  2. Assign an instructional strategy to each objective.
  3. Use the strategy as a prescription for content development.
  4. Attach the content and the test questions to the object.
Other guidelines are self-evident. We need to provide authors with training and help to ensure they can work with the strategies effectively. Each organization needs standard formats for how the content will appear in training products. Editorial guidelines will be required to help authors use terms, writing styles and other techniques to ensure that an object will make sense when it appears in a sequence with other objects.

What are instructional design strategies?

In general, the guidelines are centered on the use of instructional strategies. What are they? Instructional strategies are methods, or rules that can be applied to the presentation of instruction. Think of them like a prescription, or a “treatment plan” for getting information across to the learner. A particularly useful strategy would address some or all of the familiar instructional design problems. A “best-of-all-possible” strategy would also address the additional issues raised when we try to compose content as learning objects.

A set of such strategies happens to exist in the form of a method of instructional design called the Component Display Methodology. Educational Psychologist M.David Merrill, and others developed the methodology over years of research.

The Component Display Methodology is predicated on three key elements:
  1. The domain of most content we need to convey falls into types or classifications.
  2. Each objective will represent one type of content; hence it can be classified.
  3. Each classification is associated with an instructional strategy that best conveys that type of content.
This means that every objective will be written to represent a single type of content. Once it is classified by the type of content it represents, an instructional strategy is applied to prescribe how the content should be organized to best teach that type of objective. The strategy is comprised of a series of instructional events, or components.

Content types

The kinds of content and classifications that are attributed to Component Display vary. Example content classifications include:

Fact Recall: remember simple, factual inforation.
Structure Recall: remember the parts of a structure and their functions.
Concept Use a concept to recognize or classify something.
Process Use knowledge of a process to pinpoint the cause of a fault, or predict consequences of a manipulation, in a system.
Procedure Use a procedure to do something step by step.
Rule Use a formula, algorithm or operational guidelines to perform a complex operation.

Notice that only two types of content require recall. These are “lower level” objectives. The rest require the use of a concept, process, procedure or rule to actually do something. These are higher level, interactive strategies. By using this approach, we can see the level of objectives we are writing very clearly, and strive to frame them at the higher, more interactive level.

Each objective (or object) is assigned one of the above classifications. This influences the way objectives are written in the first place. By causing an objective statement to be framed to represent only one type of content, the scope of the objective becomes more manageable. It will also be more consistent with the scope of other objectives because a universal rule is being applied.

Instructional components

Every strategy in the Component Display Methodology is implemented by displaying a set of instructional components, or events. By displaying the components, the objective is presented in a way that best teaches that type of content.

Most classifications are presented with the same type of components, but how the components are developed is different for each strategy.

The components that make up each strategy (with a few exceptions) are:

Various Colors Representing Components
This model breaks the content into smaller, “sub-components.” Each component has certain characteristics, based on the kind of content. Learners can proceed through the components from left to right. This gives them the main idea, or “generality” first. The other components help them understand and use the main idea to attain the objective.

Some learners prefer to proceed through the components in a non-linear path. For example, one learner might want to first view the examples, try the practice, and perhaps see if she can extrapolate the main idea. This way the content is adaptable to different learning styles.

For example

Let’s say we want to teach someone about how an automobile engine works. We know we’ll break the content down by “systems.” One system is the cooling system. How do we approach this one?

We want the learner to understand how the cooling system works. We could write an objective as a FACT, or informational objective to teach all the components, technical specifications and so on. This would require a lot of recall on the part of the learner. We may need this type of objective, but first let’s shoot higher, for something more interactive.

So, we’ll write a “PROCESS” objective, which will require the learner to use knowledge of a process (cooling system process) to identify a fault or predict consequences.

We write this objective: “Given a description of operating conditions and indications of a cooling system problem, identify the most likely cause of the problem.”

Here is a specification for how the content for this learning object might be developed according to the Process strategy:

Introduction Brief statement to introduce the content (one short paragraph).

Main Idea Drawing or graphic showing flow of water through the components. Describe what is happening at each component.(One page; illustration with explanation)

Explanation Explain how each component affects the water temperature. Briefly describe how the component works (about two pages).

Examples Explain how the system reacts to a set of conditions. Examples to cover (1) faulty thermostat, (2) low water, 3) malfunctioning pump.

Practice Give indications and require diagnosis for range of problems: leaky hose, thermostat stuck open, thermostat stuck shut.


Properties of a learning object

Now let’s look at the properties of a learning object in light of the use of instructional strategies. The strategy adds more details to the properties of the object. The content block is broken into components, or events of instruction.

Schematic Showing Content Block Broken into Components

Assignment of a content type and strategy addresses a number of issues associated with the use of learning objects. The strategy promotes consistency in size and scope of the objects because each object will only address one type of content. It also helps to ensure that the content will be presented with all of the parts necessary to actually teach.

It also provides a standard prescription that authors can follow to develop this type of content. Learning objects will be complete, consistent, and instructionally effective. Learners can use the content according to their individual learning style.

Learn more about Content Management.
Training Materials for the Information Age
Introduction
Learning Object Design
Content Management
Information Retrieval
 
Home | VISION Overview | VISION Developer | VISION Learning Station | Framework | Learning Objects
Strategies | Templates | White Papers | Services | Clients | Member Login | Company Overview | Employment | News and Events | Contact Us